Advances in orbital theory have also kept up with these increasing accuracy demands, due to the progress made in manipulating complex algebraic problems by computers. A recent example is the development of an orbital theory accurate to the third power of the earth's flattening [30]. Suitable satellites, which reduce the non-gravitational per turbations and which enable the measurements to be reduced to a well defined mass center will also be necessary in the future. Such a satellite is now being planned by the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory [31] for observing accurately the motions of the earth about its center of mass. 1 hope that 1 have succeeded in some of the ob jectives I set out in the introduction and that the choice of paths at the cross-roads is more clear for the specific problem discussed here. We have to develop precise laser tracking stations, well distri buted around the world, and we have to study some of the proposed new complementary techniques. On the theoretical side we have to investigate the optimum methods for using this new data; we have to improve our orbital theories and the represen tation of the geopotential. Finally we have to con tinue work on the interpretation of the results ob tained and to investigate their relationship to other geophysical quantities. References 1. E. M. Gaposchkin and K. Lambeck, 1969, Smithsonian Standard Earth (II). Smithsonian Astrophs. Obs. Spec. Rept., 315, 1970. 2. E. M. Gaposchkin and K. Lambeck, The earth's gravity field to 16th. degree and station coordinates from satellite and terrestrial data. J. Geophys. Res., 1971 (in press). 3. K. Lambeck and E. M. Gaposchkin, Geodetic para meters for a standard earth. Space Research XI, Aka- demie Verlag, Berlin, 1971. 4. W. M. Kaula, Theory of satellite geodesy. Blaisdell publishing company, Waltham, Mass., 1966. 5. W. M. Kaula, Tests and combination of satellite deter minations of the gravity fields with gravimetry. J. Geo phys. Res., 71, 5303, 1966. 6. K. Lambeck, Comparison of surface gravity data with satellite data. Bull. Geod., 100, 1971. 7. H. Jeffreys, The Earth, 4th edition, Cambridge Uni versity Press, Cambridge, 1962. 8. W. M. Kaula, Elastic models of the mantle corresponding to variations in the external gravity field, J. Geophys. Res., 68, 4967, 1963. 9. D. P. McKenzie, Some remarks on heat flow and gravity anomalies. J. Geophys. Res., 72, 6261, 1967. 10. W. H. Munk and G. J. F. MacDonald, The rotation of the earth. Cambridge University Press, 1960. 11. R. R. Newton, Ancient astronomical observations and the acceleration of the earth and moon. John Hopkins University, Applied Physics Laboratory. Part 1, 1968; Part II, 1969. 12. J. W. Wells,, Palaeontological evidence of the rate of the earth's rotation. The Earth-Moon System, edited by B. G. Marsden and A. G. W. Cameron, Plenum Press, New York, 1966. 13. D. P. McKenzie, The viscosity of the lower mantle. J. Geophys. Res., 71, 3995, 1966. 14. W. M. Kaula, Introduction to Planetary Physics. John Wiley, New York, 1968. 15. L. Knopoff, The upper mantle of the earth, Science, 163, 1277, 1969. 16. R. K. McConnell, Viscosity of the earth's mantle. The history of the earth's crust. Edited by R. A. Phinney, Princeton, 1968. 17. P. Goldreich and A. Toomre, Some remarks on polar wandering. Geophys. Res., 74, 2555, 1969. 18. J. J. Enrbleton, Evidence of rapid polar shift from the palaeomagnetic record of Eurasia. Nature, 222, 1036, 1969. 19. W. H. Munk and G. J. F. MacDonald, Continentinality and the gravitational field of the earth. J. Geophys. Res., 65, 2169, 1960. 20. R. Hide and K. T. Horai, On the topography of the core- mantle interface. Phys. Earth. Planet Interiors, 1, 305, 1968. 21A. M. Cook, Sources of low order in the external gravity field of the earth. Nature, 198, 1186, 1963. 22. R. Hide and S. R. C. Malin, Novel correlations between global features of the earth's gravitational and magnetic fields. Nature, 225, 605, 1970. 23. B. J. Oliver Isacks and J. R. Sykes, Seismology and the new global tectonics. J. Geophys. Res., 73, 5855, 1968. 24. X. Le Pichon, Sea floor spreading and continental drift, J. Geophys. Res., 73, 3661, 1968. 25. J. R. Heirtzler, G. O. Dickson, E. M. Herron, W. C. Pitt- man and X. Le Pichon, Marine magnetic anomalies, geomagnetic field reversals, and motions of the ocean floor and continents, J. Geophys. Res., 73, 2119, 1968. 26. W. M. Kaula, Earth's gravity field: relation to global tectonics. Science 169, 982, 1970. 27. D. P. McKenzie, The driving mechanism of plate tectonics. Presented at the First European Earth and Planetary Physics Colloquium, Reading, 1971. 28. N. S. von Arx, Level Surface profiles across the Puerto Rico trench. Science 154, 1651, 1966. 29. W. M. Kaula, Chairman, The terrestrial environment: Solid earth and ocean physics. NASA contractor report, CR-1579, 1970. 30. E. M. Gaposchkin, J. R. Cherniack, R. Briggs and B. Benima, Third order oblateness perturbations for an artificial satellite, Presented at the third international symposium on the use of artificial satellites for geodesy, Washington, 1971. 31. G. C. Weiffenbach and T. E. Hoffman, A passive stable satellite for earth physics applications. Smithsonian Astrophys. Obs. Spec. Rept. 329, 1970. 54 ngt 72

Digitale Tijdschriftenarchief Stichting De Hollandse Cirkel en Geo Informatie Nederland

Nederlands Geodetisch Tijdschrift (NGT) | 1972 | | pagina 16