145 If the boolean (logical) expression (2.2.1) |9ft ?ft/2| S A I (Aft AA/2) /COS cp i S (2.2.1) has the value true, and the step size is not extremely great or small, then the computed coordinates have the required accuracy and the procedure stops the process. If the boolean expression (2.2.1) has the value false then the process is repeated by halving the step size, until the required accuracy is reached. A test has been built in for extreme requirements that cannot be reached, e.g. by the limits of the word size of the computer. In the formula (2.2.1) we denote by 9h, h the latitude, longitude computed with a step size A 9a/2, aa/2 the latitude, longitude computed with a step size A/2 s the accuracy of the latitude of point P; this para meter is in the procedure named eps For the step size ds an experimental formula (2.2.2) has been developed, dependent on s ds (5 0.43 ln(s))*io5. (2.2.2) Mostly after one or two repetitions of the process the required accuracy has been reached. The procedure has been tested on several geodesies, also in extreme places and directions. For the computer which we generally use, the TR4 (Telefunken), the computation of a geodesic of 100 km takes less than a second, a geodesic of 1000 km takes about 3 seconds, with an accuracy of 0.0001" in latitude. (A floating point multiplication on the TR4 takes 32 p.s, for details see [7].) 3. The reverse problem 3.1 Description of the method. Given are the geographical coordinates of the points Po and Pi. The problem is to compute the distance s and the azimuths A0 in Po and 4i in P, on a given ellipsoid. Pole 90-1 90- Figure 2.

Digitale Tijdschriftenarchief Stichting De Hollandse Cirkel en Geo Informatie Nederland

Tijdschrift voor Kadaster en Landmeetkunde (KenL) | 1967 | | pagina 27