283 The existence of the SHAR effect in observations of spinning pendulous gyroscopes generally, was confirmed by limited tests carried out on both a Wild T16 theodolite (No. 102025) and GAKi attachment (No. 2890) and a Fennel KTi (single second) gy- rotheodolite (No. 108051). The predicted "high-low" range mani fested itself in observations taken with both these instruments and served to confirm the secondary patterns obtained with GAKi (No. 3139). Conclusions The experimental work described above has, in addition to verifying previous beliefs and contentions regarding accuracies of gyroscopes and observing techniques, thrown new light on the relatively unknown anomalous behaviour of the spinning gyroscope. Results presented in this paper reflect azimuth accuracies for the GAK1/T2 equipment well above the manufacturer's claim. In this respect, forward and reverse azimuth determinations along a known test line nine kilometres in length were in agreement to within approximately five seconds of arc. Periodic redeterminations of the instrumental calibration constant will help to ensure peak- performance of the gyrotheodolite. Comparisons between the reversal point and transit field pro cedures appear to substantiate the maker's claims of accuracy parity of the two methods for determining 0O. The transit method, whilst being less tiring to the observer, does nonetheless require a stop watch with trailing second hand as an essential extra. In the authors' opinion, when five or six reversal points (transits) are to be observed, the choice is an arbitrary one, but with obser vations being carried out over a longer period of time, the less tiresome procedure is recommended. When the reversal point method is applied, and to a certain extent this applies to the transit method as well, the SHAR effect should be used as a criterion for judging the completeness of the set of observations and hence whether the stability line has been successfully captured; as has been described in the body of the paper. A cknowledgements The authors are particularly grateful to Messrs. Wild of South Africa, Ltd., for their kindness in providing the test equipment. Especial thanks are also due to Mr. A. Raffle for his initiation of the loan and assistance with some of the observations, and to Mr. B. Schneider for carrying out the specified modifications to the T2 theodolite. Mr. P. R. Janisch of the Transvaal and Orange Free State Chamber of Mines Research Laboratories is also thanked for making the Fennel KTi gyrotheodolite available to the authors for com parison purposes.

Digitale Tijdschriftenarchief Stichting De Hollandse Cirkel en Geo Informatie Nederland

Tijdschrift voor Kadaster en Landmeetkunde (KenL) | 1967 | | pagina 17