they are responsible for 60% of the models that are marketed. Japan and England rank second, each for about 14%. I refer to [42] for details. It should be noted that the numbers mentioned there do not include East European countries, since information from these countries is lacking. Whilst the above remarks refer to electronic computing in general, survey calculation is itself progressing. Numerous publi cations testify to this development, of which I wish to mention a few. One gets an impression from [43] about the state of affairs at the beginning of 1965. In France, the central Calculating and Drawing Office of Géomètres-Experts had become a success. Orders, mainly connected with road design are rapidly increasing. A drawing machine, a Calcomp 506 for profile drawing, replaces twenty-five draughtsmen. From the profile drawings the camera of a Calcomp 835 composes a perspective "film" of the road in projection, which enables a comparison between alternate solutions to be made. See among others [44]. On the basis of experiences B. G. Müller gives his reflections in [45] on possible uses for cal culating and drawing machines. One finds a similar study by B. Schraden in [46], in which he pays a good deal of attention to the development of Zuse computers and further to programming languages. A description of AIB and the Nordisk system for geodesy is given by G. Simonsson in [47]. In [48] a contribution from Russia is to be found in which are listed the conditions with which compu ters that are to be used for survey calculations in the field should comply. In the period the report refers to, various studies have been made of programming techniques and certain computers. For those interested, I have made a selection. In [49] the writer deals with basic principles and regulations for the programming of computers for digital operation. C. W. B. King demonstrates in [50] how a small computer can be programmed for survey calculations and for problems of adjustment. The procedures described have already been successfully used for the IBM 1620 computer. In addition to "calculations in land redistribution" by the Zuse Z 11, H. Seifers discusses in [51] the possibilities for this kind of calculation when using the Z 25. Programs for effecting simple survey calculations with the aid of the UMC-i electronic computer are dealt with in [52]. W. Helpap gives in [53] a review and a further explanation on calculating programs for survey calculations with the aid of the Cellatron SER-2b. That activity in the electronic computation of survey problems is widespread is shown by the related publications originating from a variety of countries. A small selection is given here Czechoslovakia [54], Argentina [55], Japan [56], Sweden [57], Canada [58], Germany [59], Chile [60]. There is hardly any part of survey activity which has not been 177

Digitale Tijdschriftenarchief Stichting De Hollandse Cirkel en Geo Informatie Nederland

Tijdschrift voor Kadaster en Landmeetkunde (KenL) | 1968 | | pagina 35